Neurobiological Blind Spot

The Nervous System and the Invisibility of Modern Threats

The human nervous system is the result of a very long evolutionary process. Its fundamental structures emerged hundreds of millions of years ago in an environment shaped by immediate, physical dangers. Predators, hunger, and injury constituted acute threats that required rapid responses. Accordingly, a nervous system evolved that is highly sensitive to sudden stimuli, clear causes, and immediately impending consequences. Fear, stress, and pain functioned as effective warning signals that enabled swift action.

Modern threats such as digital surveillance, however, differ fundamentally from these evolutionary conditions. They are abstract, long-term, and unreadable to the senses. There is no sound, no pain, no clearly identifiable attacker. The effects of digital surveillance unfold gradually: through data collection, behavioral analysis, profiling, and the possibility of future control. These very characteristics make such threats difficult for the nervous system to detect. What cannot be directly experienced does not trigger a classical alarm response.

This reveals an evolutionary mismatch. While the nervous system responds with maximum alertness to a “lion in the bushes,” it remains largely passive in the face of structural intrusions into autonomy and freedom. Although people may rationally understand that digital surveillance is problematic, this knowledge rarely translates into a strong emotional sense of threat. The result is a discrepancy between cognitive insight and affective reaction.

Instead of fear, a diffuse state emerges: low-level unease, fatigue, and resignation. This state is neurobiologically problematic, as it motivates neither flight nor resistance. The nervous system remains in chronic stress without recognizing a clear course of action.

At the societal level, this neurobiological blind spot has far-reaching consequences. Because the nervous system fails to provide a reliable warning function, abstract threats must be processed through cultural, legal, and political systems. These systems, however, are slower, more conflict-prone, and more easily influenced. As a result, digital surveillance can often establish itself below the threshold of subjective perception, without provoking significant resistance.

The nervous system is not evolutionarily designed to intuitively recognize abstract forms of power as danger. Digital surveillance exploits this weakness.

Safety as Reward

The Neurobiological Logic of Survival - When Safety Becomes the Ultimate Reward

Someone comforts themselves with the thought:I cannot stop the surveillers from doing anything, but I can take comfort in feeling safe from them (not actually becoming safe).

The feeling of safety is not a neutral state, but an active achievement of the nervous system. When a threat has been successfully managed, the nervous system signals to the individual that a task has been “solved.” This signal is accompanied by relief, calm, and sometimes even a sense of well-being.

From an evolutionary perspective, this makes sense. In a world filled with immediate dangers, the nervous system had to distinguish between alarm and all-clear. Under threat, the sympathetic nervous system dominates: heart rate increases, attention narrows, and pain is suppressed. Once a person reaches a protected space, however, the system shifts. The parasympathetic nervous system takes over, stress hormones decrease, and muscle tension relaxes. The subjective experience of this transition is the feeling of safety.

This feeling functions as positive feedback:You survived. Your behavior was successful.Situations, places, or actions that led to safety are stored and preferentially sought out in the future. Safety thus becomes a central reinforcer of adaptive behavior.

It is important to note that safety is always relative. It does not exist in absolute terms, but only in contrast to a preceding threat. It becomes perceptible only after danger. For this reason, safety can paradoxically become addictive. After intense threat, the safe state feels particularly rewarding.

This logic also explains why the nervous system struggles with abstract, persistent threats. When there is no clear moment of all-clear—no room in which no one is shooting—the reward fails to appear. Instead, a state of chronic tension emerges.

After extreme fear or threat, safety becomes the dominant emotion—so powerful that it temporarily overrides all other feelings.

Safety becomes the ultimate reward because, biologically, it confirms survival.

Between Reality and Feeling - The Power of Perceived Safety

What happens when a threat does not fully disappear, but merely recedes temporarily from perception? This very situation—the constant oscillation between danger and apparent safety—produces a remarkably intense emotional experience: the reward for survival.

The real threat may still exist—the enemy is not defeated, the danger not eliminated. Yet the nervous system can respond to a moment of relative calm as if the threat were over. This feeling of safety is more intense than many other sensations because it activates the evolutionary signal of survival. Heart rate, muscle tension, and vigilance decrease; endorphins and dopamine are released; the parasympathetic nervous system signals:You survived.

Interestingly, the feeling of perceived safety overrides all other emotions. Pleasure, joy, curiosity, or social attachment recede into the background, while the perception of “no longer being in danger” triggers a kind of inner jubilation. The discrepancy between objective reality and subjective experience makes this moment particularly intense. One cannot truly stop the enemy, and yet one can feel safe from them—a paradoxical but deeply human experience.

This phenomenon demonstrates that emotions are not strictly bound to external conditions. The nervous system rewards survival immediately, even if the threat only temporarily recedes or continues to exist latently. Safety thus becomes an autonomous, almost overwhelming experience—evidence that human emotional life is often anchored in the difference between objective danger and subjective perception.

In a world where threats are subtle, invisible, or permanent, this neurobiological pattern remains relevant. Humans respond emotionally to safety, even when it is only felt. The reward for survival thus becomes one of the most powerful forces in our emotional lives—stronger than many other sensations, because it directly affirms the foundation of all existence: survival itself.